We Built the Audit We Wished
Existed When We Needed It.
Enterprise AI teams move fast. Compliance infrastructure doesn't. AuditPulse was built by operators who watched brilliant founding teams deploy AI into production without any structured way to know what regulatory exposure they were creating - not because they didn't care, but because the tools didn't exist. We built them.
The Gap Between
"We Think We're Compliant"
and "We Can Prove It."
When a board member asks about AI compliance, most CTOs give an honest but unstructured answer. When an enterprise procurement team requests evidence of AI governance, most startups scramble. When a regulator asks for documentation, most companies discover they have none.
The problem isn't intent. It's infrastructure. AI compliance has been either impossibly expensive - $10,000+ per year for platforms built for compliance teams - or dangerously informal, relying on a founder's best guess.
AuditPulse sits in the gap. A diagnostic rigorous enough to surface real findings. A report structured enough to present to a board. A price accessible enough that every AI team can afford to know where they stand.
Four Frameworks.
One Structured Report.
Zero Guesswork.
EU AI Act
The most consequential AI regulation in force today. We map your stack against risk classification, data governance, transparency obligations, human oversight requirements, and accuracy monitoring - with specific article citations on every finding.
NIST AI RMF 1.1
The US federal framework for AI risk management. We instrument all four functions - GOVERN, MAP, MEASURE, MANAGE - and produce evidence-grade documentation against each subcategory.
ISO 42001:2024
The international standard for AI management systems. Our methodology was designed against Clauses 4-10 and produces findings that align directly with certification requirements.
SOC 2 Type II
The trust services criteria most enterprise procurement teams require. We map your AI infrastructure against security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy controls.
Any Founder Can Ask an AI if They're Compliant.
That's Not What You're Buying.
A Chat Window Can't Sign Anything
When your board asks about AI compliance, you need a document - not a conversation. When an investor requests evidence of governance during due diligence, a PDF carries weight that a screenshot of a chat doesn't. AuditPulse produces a structured, framework-mapped report you can actually present.
General Answers vs Specific Findings
An AI chatbot gives you general guidance based on general questions. AuditPulse maps your specific answers - about your specific models, your specific data, your specific jurisdiction - to specific regulatory articles and produces findings you can act on. The difference is specificity, and specificity is what compliance requires.
The Artifact Is the Product
Compliance is not a state of mind. It is a documented record of what you assessed, when you assessed it, what you found, and what you did about it. AuditPulse produces that record. A chat conversation does not.
Your Compliance Status
Has an Expiry Date.
The EU AI Act publishes implementation guidance quarterly. NIST AI RMF releases updates without warning. National regulators add country-specific requirements continuously. A company that was compliant in January can be exposed by April without changing a single line of code.
The Compliance Monitor watches every framework you're mapped against and alerts you within 24 hours when new guidance affects your risk score - before your board, your auditor, or a regulator finds it first.
Monthly Regulatory Pulse
A plain English summary of what changed and what it means for your stack.
Automatic Re-scoring
Before/after comparison every time frameworks update.
Zero-Day Alerting
Immediate 24-hour alerts for highly critical regulatory modifications impacting your sector.
API Architecture Guidance
Actionable engineering steps explaining exactly what logic must be patched.